AI summary Trust: low Forum scrape

This COA was extracted from a community forum / Discord channel. The original poster claimed a lab tested Jett Labs' MOTS-C, reporting 98.862% purity via HPLC + MS and a quantity deviation of -5.625% (37.75mg tested vs 40mg label). However, the lab's signature is not directly verifiable from this source, and the image has passed through at least one re-share, indicating a chain-of-custody gap. This should be treated as community signal, not confirmation.

Watch out for
  • chain-of-custody gap
  • no endotoxin test
  • vendor-submitted sample
Test date
2025-12-03
Purity
98.86% 98.862%
Batch / lot
—
Lab
Unknown
Quantity
label 40mg tested 37.75mg
Qty vs label
-5.6%
Endotoxins
—
Test score
—
Manufacturer
Jett Labs
View vendor profile
Source

Forum / Discord scrape

⚠ Asserted only
No verifiable evidence captured. This entry was added to our corpus from Forum / Discord scrape. We did not save the certificate image, did not hash an artifact, and the upstream URL is either a domain root or absent — we cannot independently confirm this report existed. Treat as curator-asserted only.
Method
HPLC + MS
Dose
40mg
Catalogued
2026-04-17
OCR text

Raw extracted text

Extracted via OCR. Names, emails, phone numbers, and street addresses are auto-redacted before display. 

{
  "peptide": "MOTS-C",
  "dose": "40mg",
  "purity_pct": 98.862,
  "purity_label": "98.862%",
  "method": "HPLC + MS",
  "test_date": "2025-12-03",
  "client": "Jett Labs",
  "notes": "",
  "label_qty": "40mg",
  "tested_qty": "37.75mg",
  "quantity_deviation_pct": -5.625,
  "is_blend": false,
  "components_json": "",
  "ocr_confidence": 0.95
}
This COA is part of TitrateLab's community-trust corpus. See more from Jett Labs or learn how trust scores are computed on the methodology page. New to lab reports? How to read a COA →