AI summary Trust: low Forum scrape

This COA was extracted from a community forum attachment. The original poster claimed a lab tested HM Peptide's Semax, reporting 99.746% purity and 9.83mg tested quantity against a 10mg label. However, the lab's signature is not directly verifiable from this source, as the image has passed through at least one re-share. This should be treated as community signal, not confirmation.

Watch out for
  • chain-of-custody gap
  • unknown lab
  • no endotoxin test
Test date
2025-11-13
Purity
99.75% 99.746%
Batch / lot
—
Lab
Unknown
Quantity
label 10mg tested 9.83mg
Qty vs label
-1.7%
Endotoxins
—
Test score
—
Manufacturer
HM PEPTIDE
View vendor profile
Certificate

Test report image

Certificate scan
Certificate scan as published.
Source

Forum / Discord scrape

✓ Artifact captured

We have the certificate image (SHA-256 hash captured) — you can verify it loads from the upstream lab and matches the artifact below.

Dose
10mg
Catalogued
2026-05-08
Artifact hash
a3f749b7a77b3640…
OCR text

Raw extracted text

Extracted via OCR. Names, emails, phone numbers, and street addresses are auto-redacted before display. 

{
  "peptide": "Semax",
  "dose": "10mg",
  "purity_pct": 99.746,
  "purity_label": "99.746%",
  "method": "",
  "test_date": "2025-11-13",
  "client": "HM Peptide| Wholesale | OEM service",
  "notes": "",
  "label_qty": "10mg",
  "tested_qty": "9.83mg",
  "quantity_deviation_pct": -1.7,
  "is_blend": false,
  "components_json": "",
  "ocr_confidence": 0.98
}
This COA is part of TitrateLab's community-trust corpus. See more from HM PEPTIDE or learn how trust scores are computed on the methodology page. New to lab reports? How to read a COA →