AI summary Trust: low Forum scrape

This COA was extracted from a community forum attachment. The original poster claimed a lab tested VC4/Brooklyn's KLOW blend, but the lab's signature is NOT directly verifiable from this source. The test, dated January 26, 2026, used UV/Vis Spectrophotometry for quantitative assay, reporting GHK-Cu at 52.27mg (label 50mg), BPC-157 at 10.97mg (label 10mg), TB-500 at 10.79mg (label 10mg), and KPV at 10.89mg (label 10mg). This should be treated as community signal, not confirmation, due to the chain-of-custody gap.

Watch out for
  • unknown lab
  • chain-of-custody gap
  • no purity test
Test date
2026-01-26
Purity
— Pass
Blend tests typically measure quantity per component, not purity. Purity assays for multi-peptide samples need separate chromatographic runs the standalone quantity report doesn't include.
Batch / lot
—
Lab
Unknown
Quantity
—
Qty vs label
—
Endotoxins
—
Test score
— Blend
Manufacturer
VC4/Brooklyn
View vendor profile
Certificate

Test report image

Certificate scan
Certificate scan as published.
Source

Forum / Discord scrape

✓ Artifact captured

We have the certificate image (SHA-256 hash captured) — you can verify it loads from the upstream lab and matches the artifact below.

Method
UV/Vis Spectrophotometry
Dose
80mg
Catalogued
2026-05-08
Artifact hash
079579d57a5621f3…
This COA is part of TitrateLab's community-trust corpus. See more from VC4/Brooklyn or learn how trust scores are computed on the methodology page. New to lab reports? How to read a COA →