AI summary Trust: low Forum scrape

This COA was extracted from a community forum attachment. The original poster claimed a lab tested Oliviaupp@proton.me's Tesamorelin, showing 99.843% purity and a 4% quantity deviation (10.40mg tested vs 10mg label). However, the lab's signature is not directly verifiable from this source, and the image has passed through at least one re-share. This should be treated as community signal, not confirmation.

Watch out for
  • chain-of-custody gap
  • no endotoxin test
  • unknown test method
Test date
2026-04-15
Purity
99.84% 99.843%
Batch / lot
—
Lab
Unknown
Quantity
label 10mg tested 10.40 mg
Qty vs label
+4.0%
Endotoxins
—
Test score
—
Manufacturer
Unknown vendor (review) (#415)
View vendor profile
Certificate

Test report image

Certificate scan
Certificate scan as published.
Source

Forum / Discord scrape

✓ Artifact captured

We have the certificate image (SHA-256 hash captured) — you can verify it loads from the upstream lab and matches the artifact below.

Dose
10mg
Catalogued
2026-05-08
Artifact hash
acbd845a673139fa…
OCR text

Raw extracted text

Extracted via OCR. Names, emails, phone numbers, and street addresses are auto-redacted before display. 

{
  "peptide": "Tesamorelin",
  "dose": "10mg",
  "purity_pct": 99.843,
  "purity_label": "99.843%",
  "method": "",
  "test_date": "2026-04-15",
  "client": "[EMAIL_REDACTED]",
  "notes": "",
  "label_qty": "10mg",
  "tested_qty": "10.40 mg",
  "quantity_deviation_pct": 4.0,
  "is_blend": false,
  "components_json": "",
  "ocr_confidence": 1.0
}
This COA is part of TitrateLab's community-trust corpus. See more from Unknown vendor (review) (#415) or learn how trust scores are computed on the methodology page. New to lab reports? How to read a COA →