AI summary Trust: low Forum scrape

This COA was extracted from a community forum attachment. The original poster claimed a lab tested the vendor's product, reporting 95.479% purity for TB-500 and a quantity of 10.65mg against a 10mg label. However, the lab's signature is not directly verifiable from this source, and the image has passed through at least one re-share, indicating a chain-of-custody gap. This should be treated as community signal, not confirmation.

Watch out for
  • chain-of-custody gap
  • no endotoxin test
  • older (6-12mo)
Test date
2025-11-03
Purity
95.48% 95.479%
Batch / lot
—
Lab
Unknown
Quantity
label 10mg tested 10.65mg
Qty vs label
+6.5%
Endotoxins
—
Test score
—
Manufacturer
Shenzhen Maide Technology
View vendor profile
Certificate

Test report image

Certificate scan
Certificate scan as published.
Source

Forum / Discord scrape

✓ Artifact captured

We have the certificate image (SHA-256 hash captured) — you can verify it loads from the upstream lab and matches the artifact below.

Dose
10mg
Catalogued
2026-05-08
Artifact hash
dc953a5c93e8b820…
OCR text

Raw extracted text

Extracted via OCR. Names, emails, phone numbers, and street addresses are auto-redacted before display. 

{
  "peptide": "TB-500",
  "dose": "10mg",
  "purity_pct": 95.479,
  "purity_label": "95.479%",
  "method": "",
  "test_date": "2025-11-03",
  "client": "[EMAIL_REDACTED]",
  "notes": "",
  "label_qty": "10mg",
  "tested_qty": "10.65mg",
  "quantity_deviation_pct": 6.5,
  "is_blend": false,
  "components_json": "",
  "ocr_confidence": 0.98
}
This COA is part of TitrateLab's community-trust corpus. See more from Shenzhen Maide Technology or learn how trust scores are computed on the methodology page. New to lab reports? How to read a COA →