AI summary Trust: low Forum scrape

This COA was extracted from a community forum attachment. The original poster claimed a lab tested Peptide Pole HongKong's Retatrutide, reporting 99.641% purity via HPLC and a quantity of 9.80mg against a 10mg label. However, the lab's signature is not directly verifiable from this source, and the image has passed through at least one re-share, creating a chain-of-custody gap. This should be treated as community signal, not confirmation.

Watch out for
  • chain-of-custody gap
  • unknown lab
  • no endotoxin test
Test date
2025-12-12
Purity
99.64% 99.641%
Batch / lot
—
Lab
Unknown
Quantity
label 10mg tested 9.80 mg
Qty vs label
-2.0%
Endotoxins
—
Test score
—
Manufacturer
Peptide Pole HongKong
View vendor profile
Certificate

Test report image

Certificate scan
Certificate scan as published.
Source

Forum / Discord scrape

✓ Artifact captured

We have the certificate image (SHA-256 hash captured) — you can verify it loads from the upstream lab and matches the artifact below.

Method
HPLC
Dose
10mg
Catalogued
2026-05-08
Artifact hash
4f7e9ef24ff09704…
OCR text

Raw extracted text

Extracted via OCR. Names, emails, phone numbers, and street addresses are auto-redacted before display. 

{
  "peptide": "Retatrutide",
  "dose": "10mg",
  "purity_pct": 99.641,
  "purity_label": "99.641%",
  "method": "HPLC",
  "test_date": "2025-12-12",
  "client": "Peptide Pole HongKong",
  "notes": "",
  "label_qty": "10mg",
  "tested_qty": "9.80 mg",
  "quantity_deviation_pct": -2.0,
  "is_blend": false,
  "components_json": "",
  "ocr_confidence": 1.0
}
This COA is part of TitrateLab's community-trust corpus. See more from Peptide Pole HongKong or learn how trust scores are computed on the methodology page. New to lab reports? How to read a COA →