AI summary Trust: low Forum scrape

This COA was extracted from a community forum. The original poster claimed a lab tested Peptide Pole Hongkong's HGH, reporting 97.649% purity and a quantity deviation of +15.42% (41.55 IU tested vs 36 IU labeled). The lab's signature is not directly verifiable from this source, as the image has passed through at least one re-share. This should be treated as community signal, not confirmation.

Watch out for
  • chain-of-custody gap
  • no endotoxin test
  • unknown test method
Test date
2026-02-12
Purity
97.65% 97.649%
Batch / lot
—
Lab
Unknown
Quantity
label 36iu tested 13.85 mg / 41.55 IU
Qty vs label
+15.4%
Endotoxins
—
Test score
—
Manufacturer
Peptide Pole HongKong
View vendor profile
Certificate

Test report image

Certificate scan
Certificate scan as published.
Source

Forum / Discord scrape

✓ Artifact captured

We have the certificate image (SHA-256 hash captured) — you can verify it loads from the upstream lab and matches the artifact below.

Dose
36iu
Catalogued
2026-05-08
Artifact hash
7bbc9351aba36f22…
OCR text

Raw extracted text

Extracted via OCR. Names, emails, phone numbers, and street addresses are auto-redacted before display. 

{
  "peptide": "HGH",
  "dose": "36iu",
  "purity_pct": 97.649,
  "purity_label": "97.649%",
  "method": "",
  "test_date": "2026-02-12",
  "client": "Peptide Pole Hongkong",
  "notes": "",
  "label_qty": "36iu",
  "tested_qty": "13.85 mg / 41.55 IU",
  "quantity_deviation_pct": 15.42,
  "is_blend": false,
  "components_json": "",
  "ocr_confidence": 1.0
}
This COA is part of TitrateLab's community-trust corpus. See more from Peptide Pole HongKong or learn how trust scores are computed on the methodology page. New to lab reports? How to read a COA →